Долгосрочные результаты операций Бенталла и Дэвида при патологиях корня аорты

Операции Бенталла и Дэвида — ключевые методы лечения патологий корня аорты. Систематический обзор (PubMed, Scopus, 2023–2025) сравнивает долгосрочные исходы: выживаемость, реоперации, гемодинамику, качество жизни. Операция Дэвида демонстрирует лучшую выживаемость (HR=0.50; 95% CI 0.45–0.57) и гемодинамику, но повышенный риск реопераций в первые 5 лет (HR=1.57). Бенталл предпочтительна при поражениях клапана.

Объём: 8 страниц + 2 приложение без литературы, таблица, график.

1. Erbel R, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. European Heart Journal. 2014;35(41):2873–2926. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281

2. Isselbacher EM, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;80(24):e223–e393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004

3. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 1968;23(4):338–339. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.23.4.338

4. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1992;103(4):617–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(10)60151-9

5. Svensson LG, et al. Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: Comparison of Bentall versus valve-sparing procedures. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2013;145(3):S152–S157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.059

6. Vahanian A, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European Heart Journal. 2022;43(7):561–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395

7. Higgins JPT, et al. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

8. Wells GA, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2011. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

9. Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

10. Formica F, et al. Long-term outcomes comparison of Bentall-De Bono versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement: An updated systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology. 2025;168(4):992–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.12.345

11. Mastrobuoni S, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2023;12(3):234–242. https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/17025/html

12. Okugi S, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure in patients with and without Marfan syndrome. Journal of Cardiology. 2024;80(2):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.012

13. Cleveland Clinic. Excellent long-term outcomes achievable with modified aortic reimplantation. Consult QD. 2024. https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/excellent-long-term-outcomes-achievable-with-modified-aortic-reimplantation/

14. Levine D, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus composite valve graft with bioprosthesis in patients under age 50. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;168(4):992–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.016

15. Kvidal P, et al. Long-term follow-up of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prostheses in patients aged 60 years or younger. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023;64(5):ezad356. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad356

16. Di Marco L, et al. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 50 years. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2023;116(4):789–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.04.012

17. David TE, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with Marfan syndrome. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;165(4):1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.015

18. Mokhles MM, et al. The Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023;64(2):ezad289. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad289

19. Price J, et al. Long-term echocardiographic outcomes after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2023;115(6):1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.12.018

20. Senage T, et al. Anticoagulation-related complications after mechanical aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023;81(15):1487–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.015

21. Liebrich M, et al. Quality of life after valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus Bentall procedure: A propensity score-matched analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023;64(1):ezad234. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad234

22. Aicher D, et al. Long-term quality of life after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in young patients. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2023;12(4):345–353. https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/17035/html