Имплементация ответственности международных организаций за нарушения прав человека

Выпускная квалификационная (дипломная) работа на тему: Имплементация ответственности международных организаций за нарушения прав человека.

Год: 2024

Объем: 117 стр.

Оценка: отлично.

Оригинальность работы на момент публикации: 60+% по антиплагиат.вуз.

Целью исследования является проведение анализа института ответственности международных организаций на основе положений, разработанных Комиссией международного права ООН, с учетом практики международных судебных учреждений и доктринальных исследований по имплементации норм такой ответственности.

Поставленная цель дает возможность сформулировать следующие задачи исследования:

- изучить развитие концепций и теорий об ответственности организаций за нарушения основных прав и свобод человека;

- выявить особенности развития концепции ответственности международных организаций в деятельности Комиссии международного права ООН;

- рассмотреть международные нормативно-правовые акты, устанавливающие гарантии соблюдения прав и свобод человека и ответственности за нарушения данных прав;

- определить особенности реализации правовых механизмов привлечения к ответственности государств за нарушение прав человека;

- проанализировать правовые основы имплементации норм об ответственности международных организаций на основании Проекта статей об ответственности.

Объект исследования – отношения, возникающие в процессе реализации международной ответственности международных организаций в рамках международного публичного права.

Предмет исследования – нормы международного публичного права, которые определяют порядок и механизмы имплементации ответственности международных организаций, а также анализ практики международных судебных учреждений, применяющих их.

Введение 

Глава 1. Теоретическое осмысление института ответственности международных организаций  

1.1 Развитие концепций и теорий об ответственности организаций за нарушения основных прав и свобод человека 

1.2. Концепция ответственности международных организаций в деятельности Комиссии международного права ООН

Глава 2. Правовые основы международной ответственности межправительственных организаций в контексте прав человека 

2.1. Международные обязательства межправительственных организаций в сфере прав человека: общая характеристика доктринальных подходов

2.2. Договорное регулирование международной ответственности межправительственных организаций 

2.3. Обычные нормы международного права и ответственность международных организаций 

Глава 3. Имплементация международной ответственности межправительственных организаций в контексте прав человека 

3.1. Имплементация ответственности межправительственных организаций в связи с нарушением прав человека на международном уровне

3.1. Имплементация ответственности межправительственных организаций в связи с нарушением прав человека на национальном уровне

3.3. Внутриорганизационные механизмы реализации ответственности в связи с нарушением прав человека международной организации

Заключение

Список использованных источников

1.   Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 56/82. Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fifty-third session, 18 January 2002. // United Nations Digital Library System. URL: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/477/85/PDF/N0147785.pdf?OpenElement (accessed: 19.08.2023)

2.   Riddell W. Reviewed Work: La Coopération des États Dans la Lutte Contre le Faux Monnayage. Rapport et Projet de Convention Présenté à la Société des Nations Vespasian V. Pella. 143 p. A. Pedone, Paris. 1928. // Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology. – 1928. – Vol. 19. – № 3. Р. 447.

3.   Meron Th. Responsibility of States for Violations of Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms. // In: Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law, Th. Melon (ed.). – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. P. 136.

4.   Farhad M. International Criminal Responsibility of States. – Stockholm: [s.n.], 1985. P. 14.

5.   The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998. // International Cimonal Court. URL: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf (accessed: 17.06.2023)

6.   Лукашук И.И. Право международной ответственности. – М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2004. С. 89.

7.   Collins S. Collective Responsibility and International Relations. // In: The Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility, S. Bazargan-Forward, D. Tollefsen (Eds.). – New York: Routledge, 2020. P. 333.

8.   Zayets S. Philosophical Foundations of Collective Responsibility on the Example of the Activities of the European Court of Human Rights. // Philosophy of Education. – 2023. – Vol. 29. – № 1. Р. 12.

9.   Тихонов И.М. Актуальный вопрос международного права: концепция «Responsibility to protect» // Приоритетные научные направления: от теории к практике. – 2013. – № 7. – С. 203-210.

10. Карташкин В.А. Права человека и международная безопасность // Труды Института государства и права РАН. – 2013. – № 1. – С. 33-59.

11. Патюлин Г.С. Взаимная юридическая ответственность государства и человека // Труды Института государства и права РАН. – 2010. – № 6. – С. 7-22.

12. Möldner M. Responsibility of International Organizations – Introducing the ILC’s DARIO. // Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. 2012. № 16. URL: https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf4/mpunyb_06_Moeldner_161.pdf (accessed: 19.06.2023)

13. Hirsch M. The Responsibility Of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles. – Dodrecht: Nijhoff, 1995. P. 14.

14. Hartwig M. International Organizations or Institutions, Responsibility and Liability. // Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2011. URL: https://www.jura.uni-bonn.de/fileadmin/Fachbereich_Rechtswissenschaft/Einrichtungen/Lehrstuehle/Herdegen/de_Wet/WiSe_2017/Voelkerrecht_III__Collective_Security/EPIL_International_Organizations_or_Institutions_Responsibility_and_Liability.pdf (accessed: 22.06.2023)

15. Клюня А.Ю., Солнцев А.М. Вопросы развития института ответственности международных организаций. // Вестник международных организаций. – 2013. – № 2. С. 131.

16. Case Concerning The Factory at Chorzów (Merits), Judgment, 13 Sept 1928. // Publications of the permanent Court of International Justice. URL: https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup17/Batch%201/FactoryAtChorzow.pdf (accessed: 24.06.2023)

17. Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations. Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949. // International Court of Justice. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/4 (accessed: 17.06.2023)

18. Гуласарян А. С. Международно-правовая имплементация норм об ответственности международных организаций. – М.: Статут, 2015. С. 29.

19. Daugirdas K. Reputation and the Responsibility of International Organizations// the European Journal of international law. – 2014. – Vol. 25. – № 4. Р. 999.

20. Устав международного агентства по атомной энергии от 23 октября 1956 г. // Офиц. сайт МАГАТЭ. URL: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/statute_rus.pdf (дата обращения: 18.06.2023)

21. Венская конвенция о гражданской ответственности за ядерный ущерб от 21 мая 1963 г. // Офиц. сайт ООН. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pdf/circ566.pdf (дата обращения: 18.06.2023)

22. Конвенция о международной ответственности за ущерб, причиненный космическими объектами от 29 ноября 1971 г. // Офиц. сайт ООН. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/damage.shtml (дата обращения: 18.06.2023)

23. Абашидзе, А. Х. Камо грядеши… К 60-летию деятельности Комиссии международного права ООН / А. Х. Абашидзе, А. М. Солнцев // Московский журнал международного права. – 2009. – № 1. С. 137.

24. Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001. // Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2001, Vol. II. URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf (accessed: 23.06.2023)

25. The International Law Commission held its fifty-fourth session at Geneva, Switzerland, from 29 April to 7 June and 22 July to 16 August 2002. // International Law Commission. URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/54/#:~:text=The%20International%20Law%20Commission%20held,82%20of%2012%20December%202001. (accessed: 23.06.2023)

26. Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations, with commentaries. Adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-third session in 2011. // Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2011. URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf (accessed: 11.07.2023)

27. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 December 2011 № 66/100. Responsibility of international organizations. // United Nations Digital Library System. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/724634/files/A_RES_66_100-EN.pdf (accessed: 23.06.2023)

28. Report of International Law Association. Study Group on the Responsibility of International Organizations. Sofia Conference, 2012. // International Law Association. URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20150326185910/https://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/study_groups.cfm/cid/1019 (accessed: 24.06.2023)

29. Витцтум В. Граф. Международное право. – М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2015. С. 755.

30. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2006 № 61/36. Allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities. // United Nations Digital Library System. URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGA/2006/96.pdf (accessed: 23.06.2023)

31. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 December 2007 № 62/68. Consideration of prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities and allocation of loss in the case of such harm. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/613193/files/A_RES_62_68-EN.pdf?ln=ru (accessed: 23.06.2023)

32. Crawford J., Pellet A., Olleson S. The Law of International Responsibility. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Р. 969.

33. Клюня А.Ю., Солнцев А.М. Вопросы развития института ответственности международных организаций. // Вестник международных организаций. – 2013. – № 2. С. 134.

34. Application No. 71412/01 Behrami and Behrami v. France. The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 2 May 2007 as a Grand. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://www.tjsl.edu/slomansonb/3.1_UN_attrib.pdf (accessed: 26.06.2023)

35. Application no. 78166/01 by Ruzhdi SARAMATI against France, Germany and Norway. The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 2 May 2007 as a Grand. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-80830&filename=001-80830.pdf&TID=knhm- (accessed: 26.06.2023)

36. Application no. 6974/05 by Ilaz KASUMAJ against Greece. The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5 July 2007. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?library=ECHR&id=001-81976&filename=KASUMAJ%20v.%20GREECE.docx&logEvent=False (accessed: 28.06.2023)

37. Application no. 31446/02 by Slavisa GAJIC against Germany. The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 28 August 2007. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-82277&filename=GAJIC%20v.%20GERMANY.pdf&logEvent=False (accessed: 28.06.2023)

38. Application no. 36357/04, 36360/04, 38346/04, 41705/04, 45190/04, 45578/04, 45579/04, 45580/04, 91/05, 97/05, 100/05, 101/05, 1121/05, 1123/05, 1125/05, 1129/05, 1132/05, 1133/05, 1169/05, 1172/05, 1175/05, 1177/05, 1180/05, 1185/05, 20793/05 and 25496/05 by Dušan BERIĆ and Others against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged between 21 September 2004 and 4 June 2005. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-83109&filename=001-83109.pdf (accessed: 28.06.2023)

39. Application no. 27021/08 the case of Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom. The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 7 July 2011. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-105612%22]}e (accessed: 28.06.2023)

40. Устав Организации Объединенных Наций от 26 июня 1945 г. // Офиц. сайт ООН. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/charter-united-nations/index.html (дата обращения:29.06.2023)

41. Resolution 1546 (2004) Adopted by the Security Council at its 4987th meeting, on 8 June 2004. The situation between Iraq and Kuwait. // Search engine for the United Nations Security Council Resolutions. URL: http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1546 (accessed: 29.06.2023)

42. Application no. 27021/08 the case of Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom. The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 7 July 2011. // European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-105612%22]}e (accessed: 29.06.2023)

43. Gerald L. Neuman International Organizations and Human Rights – the Need for Substance, 2019 // https://hrp.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Gerald-Neuman_HRP-19_001.pdf

44. Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, U.N.G.A. Res. 56/8 (2001) [Draft Articles on State Responsibility], art. 1; ,Draft Articles on Responsibility of

45. International Organisations and Human Rights: The Role of the UN Covenants in Overcoming the Accountability Gap // https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18918131.2018.1453586

46. Committee on legal Affairs and Human Rights Accountability of international for human rights violations https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20310&lang=en

47. Gurdun Monika Zagel International Organisations and Human Rights: The Role of the UN Covenants in Overcoming the Accountability Gap // https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18918131.2018.1453586; Ludovica Poli, The Duty of Care as a Corollary of International Organizations Human Rights Obligations // https://vk.com/doc280838727_676547687?hash=EM0yJDSGkJr0PnM6GVWeEqYCXh8Pe0cfi5t0Nh8zqDw&dl=2MRuaUQTKaBCpCNMCTpXUzfZw7RLspo0f9OQ2ahdKkw

48. ICJ, ‘Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt’, Advisory Opinion (20 December 1980) 1980 ICJ Reports 73, para 37.

49. Carla Ferstman, International Organizations’ Obligations under Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law // https://academic.oup.com/book/10571/chapter-abstract/158524386?redirectedFrom=fulltext

50. Венская конвенция о праве международных договоров от 23 мая 1969 г.: офиц. текст // United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, ст. 2 (1) )(b), ст. 11 // https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_12754/;

51. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations (21 March 1986) A/CONF129/15 (VCLTIO), art 2(1)(b) and art 11 // https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/cnventions/1_2_1986.pdf

52. [1] Венская конвенция о праве международных договоров от 23 мая 1969 г.: офиц. текст // United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1155 // https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_12754/

53. Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, OUP 2012) 115f, 179f // https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/he/9780198737445.001.0001/he-9780198737445

54. Malgosia Fitzmaurice, ‘Third Parties and the Law of Treaties’ (2002) 6 MPYUNL 37 // https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf1/mpunyb_fitzmaurice_6.pdf;

55. De Schutter, Olivier. Human Rights and the Rise of International Organisations: The Logic of Sliding Scales in the Law International Responsability. In: Jan Wouters et al. (eds). Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organizations (International

56. Akbar Rasulov, ‘Revisiting State Succession to Humanitarian Treaties: Is There a Case for

57. HRC General Comment No 26: Continuity of Obligations (8 December 1997) CCPR/C/21/Rev1/Add8/Rev1, para 4. // https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/1997/en/7943

58. ICJ, ‘Legal Consequences for States’ (n 40), Dissenting Opinion Fitzmaurice paras 65ff; Henry Schermers, ‘The European Communities Bound by Fundamental Rights’ (1990) 27 CMLR 249, 251ff; De Schutter (n 24) 62ff and and references there at n 27.

59. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947) (30 October 1947) 55 UNTS 194; for details Schreuer (n 39) 227ff; Naert (n 24) 136ff.

60. ECJ, Joined Cases 21 to 24/72 International Fruit Company v Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit [1972] ECR 1219, paras 10ff; Hirsch (n 24) 39ff; Naert (n 24) 132; Janik (n 20) 406.

61. Lorand Bartels, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 JWT 499;

62. Joost Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ (2001) 95 AJIL 535; Gabrielle Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ (2002) 13 EJIL 753.

63. ICJ, Case Concerning Application of the Convention (n 9) para 160;

64. ILC, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (13 April 2006) A/CN4/L682, para 427; Oliver Dörr, ‘Article 31’ in Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Springer 2012) 521, para 6.

65. WTO Panel Report, Biotech (n 62) para 7.70; Jennings and Watts (n 19) 1275; Marceau, ‘A Call for Coherence’ (n 62) 128; ILC, ‘Fragmentation’ (n 57) paras 37ff; Dörr (n 57) para 89.

66. Treaty on European Union (Consolidated Version 2012) (1 February 1992) [2012] OJ 2012 C326/13 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

67. Magdalena Sepúlveda, The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Intersentia 2003) 370ff;

68. Sigrun Skogly, Beyond National Borders: States’ Human Rights Obligations in International Cooperation (Intersentia 2006) 74ff;

69. Eibe Riedel and Jan-Michael Arend, ‘Article 55 (c)’ in Bruno Simma and others (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd edn, OUP 2012) 1565, para 15; Stoll (n 89) paras 5ff, 11ff.

70. Are International organizations bound by international human rights obligations? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281855869_ARE_INTERNATIONAL_ORGANISATIONS_BOUND_BY_INTERNATIONAL_HUMAN_RIGHTS_OBLIGATIONS

71. Gabriele Porretto, The application of international humanitarian law and human rights law to international organisations. No. 1. Geneve: University Center for International Humanitarian Law, 2006, Research Paper Series, pp.41-42.// https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256001697_The_Application_of_International_Humanitarian_Law_and_Human_Rights_Law_to_International_Organisations

72. Martin Faix Are International organizations bound by international human rights obligations?//https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281855869_ARE_INTERNATIONAL_ORGANISATIONS_BOUND_BY_INTERNATIONAL_HUMAN_RIGHTS_OBLIGATIONS; PELLET, Allain. Human Rightism and International law. Supra note 7, p. 5.

73. De Schutter, Olivier. Human Rights and the Rise of International Organisations: The Logic of Sliding Scales in the Law International Responsability. In: Jan Wouters et al. (eds). Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organizations (International Law: 7), Intersentia: Antwerp, 2011, p. 55-129.

74. Klein, Pierre. La responsabilité des organisations internationales dans les ordres juridiques internes et en droit des gens. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1998, p. 318; NAERT, Frederik. International

75. Ludovica Poli, The Duty of Care as a Corollary of International Organizations Human Rights Obligations // https://vk.com/doc280838727_676547687?hash=EM0yJDSGkJr0PnM6GVWeEqYCXh8Pe0cfi5t0Nh8zqDw&dl=2MRuaUQTKaBCpCNMCTpXUzfZw7RLspo0f9OQ2ahdKkw

76. General Commentary, Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations, with commentaries (A/66/10), pp. 2 et seq. //

77. ECtHR, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany, Application no. 26083/94, judgment of 18 February 1999, para. 67. See also ECtHR judgment Matthews v. United Kingdom from 18 February

78. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, O.J. C 83, 30 March 2010, 839 // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:0389:0403:en:PDF

79. Statute International criminal police organization // https://www.ipa-international.org/ipa-statutes

80. United Nations Charter // https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text

81. Cf. REINISCH, August. Developing human rights and humanitarian law accountability of the Security Council for the imposition of economic sanctions. American journal of international law. 2001, vol. 95, no. 4, p. 857.

83. [1]Carla Ferstman, International Organizations’ Obligations under Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law // https://academic.oup.com/book/10571/chapter-abstract/158524386?redirectedFrom=fulltext

84. August Reinisch, ‘Developing Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Accountability of the Security Council for the Imposition of Economic Sanc- tions’ (2001) 95(4) AJIL 854; Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (OUP 2006) 91.

85. ICCPR, Article 48, paras 1 and 3, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171. ICESCR, Article 26, paras 1 and 3, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 16 December, 1966, 993 UNTS 3.

86. Pierre Schmitt, International organizations’ human rights obligations, The Case of Individual

87. Victims of Human Rights Violations // https://www.elgaronline.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Pierre+Schmitt

88. Ludovica Poli, The Duty of Care as a Corollary of International Organizations Human Rights Obligations // https://vk.com/doc280838727_676547687?hash=EM0yJDSGkJr0PnM6GVWeEqYCXh8Pe0cfi5t0Nh8zqDw&dl=2MRuaUQTKaBCpCNMCTpXUzfZw7RLspo0f9OQ2ahdKkw; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (adopted on 13 December 2006), 2515 UNTS 3; UN General Assembly Resolution A/Res/61/ 106 (2006).

89. Tobias Lock, ‘The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European

90. ICJ, Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), 26 May 1961, I.C.J. Rep. 1961, p. 31.

91. Daugirdas, ‘How and Why’ 2016, 378–379 and n 301 (quoting comments from the International Monetary Fund, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the World Bank)

92. Daugirdas, ‘How and Why’ 2016, 347–348; Kristina Daugirdas and Sachi Schuricht Breaking the Silence: Why International Organizations Should Acknowledge Customary International Law Obligations to Provide Effective Remedies // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3539178

93. Report International Law Commission on its Sixty-Eighth Session, un Doc. A/71/10 (19 August 2016), 76–117.

94. BLECKMANN, Albert. Zur Verbindlichkeit des allgemeinen Völkerrechts für Internationale Organisationen. ZaöRV. 1977, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 113 – 120. Available online at: http://www.zaoerv. de/37_1977/37_1977_1_t_107_121.pd

95. ZWANENBURG, Marten. Accountability of peace support operations. Boston: Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 2005, p. 151; NAERT, Frederik. International Law Aspects of the EU’s Security and Defence Policy. Supra note 37, p. 394.

96. WOUTERS, Jan, BREMS, Eva, SMIS, Stefaan, SCHMITT, Pierre. Introductory Remarks. Supra note 58, p. 6.

97. WHO and Egypt ICJ Opinion, supra note 13, 89–90.

98. DARROW, supra note 14, at 130. ; 28. John Humphrey, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Its History, Impact and Juridical Character, in HUMAN RIGHTS: THIRTY YEARS AFTER THE UNI- VERSAL DECLARATION 21, 21–37 (Bertrand G. Ramcharan ed., 1979); Hurst Hannum, The Status of Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law, 25 GA. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 287, 317, 322–54 (1995).

99. SCHERMERS, Henry G., BLOKKER, Niels M. International Institutional Law. Supra note 25, p. 1001, para. 1577.

100.               Hannum, supra note 28, at 349. See, e.g., The Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 20 HUM. RTS. Q. 691 (1998) [hereinafter Maastricht Guidelines]

101.               U.N. Comm. on Econ., Soc. & Cultural Rights, General Com- ment 2: International Technical Assistance Measures (Art. 22 of the Cove- nant), ¶ 6, U.N. Doc. E/1990/23 (Feb. 2, 1990)

102.               International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights art. 22, Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3, entered into force Jan. 3, 1976; see also CLAPHAM, supra note 23, at 144 n.135.

103.               FUJITA, supra note 36, at 10; THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS: A COMMENTARY 799 (Bruno Simma et al. eds., 1994). Contra Thomas Bu- ergenthal, The World Bank and Human Rights, 31 STUD. TRANSNAT’L LEGAL POL’Y 95, 97 (1999)

104.               U.N. Charter art. 103 (“In the event of a conflict between the obliga- tions of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.”).

105.               Carla Ferstman, International Organizations’ Obligations under Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law // https://academic.oup.com/book/10571/chapter-abstract/158524386?redirectedFrom=fulltext

106.               Resolution 1979 (2014) Final version Accountability of international organisations for human rights violations // https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20510&lang=en

107.               Accountability of international organisations for human rights violations, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights p. 21 // https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20310&lang=en;

108.               Stian Øby Johansen, The Responsibility of IOs for Human Rights Violations // https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/human-rights-accountability-mechanisms-of-international-organizations/responsibility-of-ios-for-human-rights-violations/226DC082D444E4B5261A488C56143FB6

109.               Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Accountability of international organisations for human rights violations p. 40 // https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20310&lang=en

110.               Решениях ЕСПЧ от 31.05.2007 по делу "Берами и Берами (Behrami and Behrami) против Франции" (жалоба N 71412/01)// https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB002&n=275493#u7wzACUkj6V8n1Lo

111.               Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) //  https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/

112.               Договор о Европейской Союзе, ст. 19 // https://eulaw.ru/treaties/teu/