Перевод текста

Аббревиатуры связаны с атомной энергетикой, нужно дополнительно искать из значение
Continuously evolving Safety Analysis Report:
Instead of a 2-part licensing process with a construction permit application (CPA) (with preliminary safety analysis report or PSAR) and then an operating license application (OLA) (final safety analysis report or FSAR), create a continuously evolving site specific safety analysis report. Submit the CPA to the regulator for the specific project and site, and then as the design progresses, update the SAR every quarter or so on a shared server that the regulator has access to. The construction permit can be issued with conditions during this process. This could save ~12-18 months of logistics, a second application, readiness reviews, and acceptance reviews.
Color code the SAR with one color for standard plant and one color for site specific data. Then the licensee only needs to update the site specific information for a 2nd reactor. With this one step process, for the second reactor, the application could be near complete when the 2nd application is submitted with only updating the site specific data.
With the color coded SAR, when the design is taken from country to country, if the regulator agrees, the new regulator only needs to review the deltas of site specific data (and maybe sample some of the standard design information to maintain country review sovereignty).
Standardize regulator inspection processes for construction. Need to update for current SMR technology. No 10 CFR Part 52 ITAAC or Tier 1 type requirements. Gear it more towards NRC inspection manuals written with an intelligent inspector in mind, so the inspector's hands are not tied to a checklist, and the inspector can create new avenues of review. ITTAC forces into a set prescribed checklist.
If not already the case in a country, the environmental report and the construction permit application review can be done in parallel instead of in series.